Thursday, June 6, 2019

Same-sex marriage debate Essay Example for Free

Same-sex nuptials debate EssayThe world is constantly changing and evolving. It isnt possible to throw overboard this from happening, only if it is possible to stand up for what is morally right and for what isnt. And now, we are faced with what many people feel is the inevitable evolution of marriage legalizing homosexual marriages. non allowing homosexual marriages to be recognized by the government and to be legal would prevent changing a fundamental institution, would prohibit breaching the direct of Rights and Freedoms, and would prevent inconceivable consequences. Marriage has been around for as long as anyone can remember. And after all this time, it has changed very little in the eyes of the law. Every major holiness and culture has embraced marriage as a unique relationship between a man and a woman. One of the only times marriage was altered, was when no-fault decouple was legalised. No-fault divorce was introduced, and it has proven to be a complete disaster fo r children and often for the adults involved. Statistics now show that 53% of marriages end in divorce. And now, we specify ourselves gambling but again with an institution that is foundational to the well-being of our children and a healthy society.The same argument once made in support of no-fault divorce, This will not affect goodish marriages and healthy families, is now being made in support of gay marriage. Yet we have no credible evidence to prove that altering our marriage laws again will be any less problematic for children and society than was no-fault divorce. The painful lessons we have learned as a result of no-fault divorce should stop this process cold in its tracks.To fundamentally change an institution whose worth has been proved over thousands of years and in hundreds of cultures risks unintended and unexpected consequences. It is with infinite wariness that any man ought to venture upon pulling down an edifice which has answered in any tolerable degree for age s the common purposes of society.Secondly, it has been argued that prohibiting homosexuals to marry would breach the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter was modified in 1981 with the following heading Whereas Canada is founded upon the principlesthat recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law. With such an acknowledgement, how could the acceptance of same-sex marriages even be considered? Time and again, the Bible all the way states and demonstrates Gods position on quirkSodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because of homosexuality (Gen 1820-21 195-7, 13)Homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor 69-10)Those who practice homosexuality are called perverted men (Jdg 1922)The penalty under the Old Testament for homosexuality was death (Lev 2013)It is abominable, whether committed by men or women (Ro 126-27)Three Ontario judges stated that prohibiting gay couples from marrying violates the Charter The Charter, acknowledging the supremacy (ie. dominion, preemin ence) of God strikes down any notion that same-sex marriages can be accepted in Canada.Thirdly, the Marriage Act of Ontario, when speaking of a marriage mentions a man and wife. How does a same-sex couple fit this definition? The same document outlines a harken of people whom a man cannot marry (grandmother, mother, daughter, sister, granddaughter). Likewise, a list of people whom a woman cannot marry is provided (grandfather, father, son, brother, grandson). If the Marriage Act permitted homosexual marriages, why is a man not restricted from marrying his grandfather, father, son, brother, grandson? And likewise, why is a woman not restricted from marrying her grandmother, mother, daughter, sister, granddaughter? It is for the simple reason that same-sex marriages do not fall within the role model of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Marriage Act of Ontario, or most importantly, Gods holy word.To change the definition of marriage would be to change the temperament of marriage to commend that, the full impact of the change must be understood. And that impact must be considered not just at the individual level, but most importantly at the societal level, and not just for the present, but also the future.Definition (and language in general) create human reality. We dont just change words, we change the nature of an entity when we redefine it. Definitions are frames that we place on events, concepts or circumstances, in order to give them essence we frame reality with language in order to find meaning in that reality. Those in the gay community who want same-sex marriage are right to seek meaning in their relationships and to want to have that meaning publicly recognized. They are wrong, however, to try to do it by co-opting the institution of marriage. The institution of marriage cannot function in that way without being deformed and destroyed.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.